Ya se empieza a hablar mucho sobre el HTML 5 ¿Ques es esto?
El HTML es codigo mas basico que hay para la creacion de una pagina web actualmente estamos en las versiones 4.1 la cual a la epoca se le notan muchas carencias que los desarrolladores web anelamos no continuen en la siguiente version, articulos sobre esto ay un sin fin (busqueda en Google), entre los mas completos estan:
- La mejoras del HTM 5
- Principales Diferencias entre HTML4 y HTML5
- W3c, WHATWG y HTML
- WHATWG HTML5 (ingles)
- HTML5 – XHTML 2 el futuro de la web (ingles)
Pero bueno Andres de Anieto2k a publicado un post con un codigo que muestra como se veria el codigo de un blog utilizando HTML5.
<html>
<head>
<title>Mokka mit Schlag </title>
</head>
<body>
<header>
<h1><a href=”http://www.elharo.com/blog”>Mokka mit Schlag</a></h1>
</header>
<section>
<article>
<h2><a href=”/blog/birding/2007/04/23/spring-comes-and-goes-in-sussex-county/”>
Spring Comes (and Goes) in Sussex County</a></h2><p>Yesterday I joined the Brooklyn Bird Club for our
annual trip to Western New Jersey, specifically Hyper
Humus, a relatively recently discovered hot spot. It
started out as a nice winter morning when we arrived at
the site at 7:30 A.M., progressed to Spring around 10:00
A.M., and reached early summer by 10:15. </p>
</article><article>
<h2><a href=”/blog/birding/2007/04/23/but-does-it-count-for-your-life-list/”>
But does it count for your life list?</a></h2><p>Seems you can now go <a
href=”http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/
2007/04/cone_sf”>bird watching via the Internet</a>. I
haven’t been able to test it out yet (20 user
limit apparently) but this is certainly cool.
Personally, I can’t imagine it replacing
actually being out in the field by any small amount.
On the other hand, I’ve always found it quite
sad to meet senior birders who are no longer able to
hold binoculars steady or get to the park. I can
imagine this might be of some interest to them. At
least one elderly birder did a big year on TV, after
he could no longer get out so much. This certainly
tops that.</p>
</article>
<nav>
<a href=”/blog/page/2/”>« Previous Entries</a>
</nav>
</section>
<nav>
<ul>
<li><h2>Info</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href=”/blog/comment-policy/”>Comment Policy</a></li>
<li><a href=”/blog/todo-list/”>Todo List</a></li>
</ul></li>
<li><h2>Archives</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href=’chrome://xinhahere/content/xinha_editor.html/blog/2007/04/’>April 2007</a></li>
<li><a href=’chrome://xinhahere/content/xinha_editor.html/blog/2007/03/’>March 2007</a></li>
<li><a href=’chrome://xinhahere/content/xinha_editor.html/blog/2007/02/’>February 2007</a></li>
<li><a href=’chrome://xinhahere/content/xinha_editor.html/blog/2007/01/’>January 2007</a></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</nav>
<footer>
<p>Copyright 2007 Elliotte Rusty Harold</p>
</footer>
</body>
</html>
Si se fijan la semantica que nos muestra el codigo es bastante entendible header, footer, section, articles.
